« December 2008 | Main | February 2009 »

January 2009

January 30, 2009

5,000,000 Reviews and counting...

Yelpers have been a busy bunch in January, I'm happy to report we've just crossed the 5 million review mark. That's a lot of reviews written in a short period of time, a million just in the last 4 months! Things have been shooting up on the site traffic side as well; Google Analytics reports that in the last 30 days we've seen...

18,407,017 Absolute Unique Visitors

We often see a boost in site activity and traffic in January and I'm not entirely sure of the root cause. Perhaps the cold weather keeps people huddled by their warm laptops... if you have a better theory let me know!

January 28, 2009

Shill Reviews in the News

A couple of review scandals involving product reviews (on Amazon) have been in the news of late. The newest one came to my attention yesterday when David Pogue over at the New York Times uncovered biased reviews for a Carbonite product, written by employees.

In case you were wondering how Yelp protects against fake or biased reviews, I figured I'd mention that since 2006 we've had an automated system designed to protect against untrustworthy reviews, such as those written by an employee, business owner, or perhaps an ex-employee with a bone to pick. Having this system means that certain reviews disappear from (or return to) a business' page from time to time. Our software covers both advertisers and non-advertisers alike so every business is treated exactly the same (contrary to the ludicrous rumors we sometimes hear).

The fact that well established consumer product companies have been caught shilling underscores the importance of our vigilance. We will continue to weed out untrustworthy reviews so that consumers can safely rely on Yelp, but it remains a constant struggle. Your feedback helps a great deal, so please keep it coming!

January 25, 2009

Op-ed in the SF Chronicle

I was recently invited to write an opinion piece for the San Francisco Chronicle discussing Yelp, issues of free speech, and what it all means for local businesses. My thanks to the editors for dedicating the space. Below is my submission (printed in Monday's paper)...


One day in the summer of 2004, I got sick and needed to see a doctor. I asked friends for referrals, but most of them were Bay Area transplants and didn't have any good recommendations. I searched on Google, but found only generic lists on health insurance Web sites. I wanted a doctor that fit my needs, not just any doctor. I wondered why it was so easy to find consumer reviews for products like books and electronics, but so hard to find good referrals for local service providers like doctors and plumbers. My frustration turned to opportunity when I started Yelp with my friend, Russ Simmons. The Yelp website helps people share their knowledge about local businesses. Yelp usage has grown quickly; last month 17 million consumers used the site to read 4.5 million reviews about local businesses in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom.


Yelp's increasing influence on local commerce has led business owners (and local press) to ask: Is Yelp a good thing for small business? For those businesses who treat their customers well (the vast majority of businesses, as it turns out), the answer is yes, because Yelp offers a phenomenal source of free marketing. Before Yelp, businesses could only reach new consumers through word of mouth and advertising. Word of mouth is great, but it travels slowly, reaching perhaps just a handful of friends. Traditional advertising has been very expensive; it can cost $60,000 or more for a full page ad in the Yellow Pages. And because Yelp is basically word-of-mouth online, it brings all the pros and cons of real referrals with the speed of the Web. So what might be the downside? That businesses can't control what their customers are saying about them on the site (just like word of mouth offline). However, when consumers research a business on Yelp, they are taking in the whole picture,  including reviews, photos and service offerings — not just honing in on one errant viewpoint.


With the cacophony of opinions on the site, it's natural to wonder whether "anything goes" on Yelp. Absolutely not. While we don't referee factual disputes, we do try to ensure that reviews reflect a firsthand experience and don't betray any obvious conflict of interest. We field inquiries daily from business owners and consumers alike, and we consider each one carefully. We've even built sophisticated, automated software to suppress suspicious reviews that might have been written by an employee, owner or competitor. As a result, most businesses will see reviews come and go from their Yelp page (whether they are a Yelp advertiser or not) as we work to ensure the site remains a trusted resource.


Local media's coverage of Yelp has often focused on the downside for businesses of negative reviews, even though 85 percent of the reviews rate businesses with three stars (out of five) or higher, and such content is helpful to consumers. As a business owner myself, I empathize with how personal a bad review can feel. In very rare cases, businesses have become so distraught over negative reviews that they have taken to the courts (as recently highlighted in two Chronicle reports). Fortunately for consumers, the core legal issues have long been settled and very clearly allow people to share their opinions — online or otherwise. In most cases, however, savvy business owners use negative reviews as an opportunity to reach out to that customer or to improve their service.


My once frustrating dilemma of finding a medical provider is history. Today, I returned to a dentist I found a couple years ago on Yelp; she now has 59 five-star reviews and a huge new office that overlooks Union Square. To create the Yelp site, we've ceded unprecedented power to consumers, but this simply means power once wielded by an elite few is now in the hands of all.

New iPhone Ad featuring Yelp!

This made me smile, a big thanks to Apple for including us in this cool TV commercial!
iPhone Commercial
Many more exciting features are in the works... so watch for another update coming soon. And if you haven't downloaded the app yet you can get it here.

January 22, 2009

Feel the awesome power of Mo

... as in Mo' Map!

Momap

After many moons of hard work and countless lines of Javascript we've managed to fully incorporate the geobrowsing power of Maptastic (an old search experiment of ours).

Next time you search just click the "Mo Map" link on the upper left corner of the map to get a giant map. Also when you move your map you can have the results automatically refresh or not (this was a hidden feature we've made more visible). Additionally, we've changed the hovers so you'll get more info when you mouseover a specific location on the map. Also our sponsored result finally shows too.

Phew, that was a mouthful. Hope you enjoy the upgrades!

January 21, 2009

The Obama Effect

Obama











The blue line is a graph of hourly visitors to Yelp's site on inauguration day and the green line is the same day, one week before. Note how traffic takes a dive precisely during President Obama's inauguration speech and festivities...

January 14, 2009

Letter to the Editor: San Francisco Chronicle (SFGate)

In the Chronicle's alarmist rush to highlight the supposed risks of online review writing they missed that a Yelp user has already won a lawsuit challenging her right to post a negative review: Styger v. Johnson, Superior Court of California, Case No. CGC-08-477322. In four years and after 4.5 million consumer reviews, we're aware of 3 business owners actually suing a customer.

A chronology...

June 8th: The Chronicle's front page covers a year old lawsuit pertaining to a negative Yelp review, blasting "Negative Yelp review triggers defamation suit".

Jan 9th: Columnist Andrew Ross takes sides in the lawsuit without knowing the facts of the case declaring "If I'm ever looking for a furniture designer, it won't be [the reviewer]."

Jan 13th: Chronicle highlights another lawsuit (filed a year after the previous) with the headline "Dentist sues over negative Yelp review". Thanks to the headline and placement, this story is undoubtedly perceived by readers as a "trend". In this case a dentist (Dr. Wong) doesn't even go on record as disputing the facts of the review.

We at Yelp stand strongly behind consumers recognizing their right to speak truthfully about their experiences (positive or negative). In America it's called protected speech and the editors and columnists of the Chronicle enjoy this right daily. 85% of the reviews on Yelp are positive (3+ stars), so the few who are brave enough to share bad experiences with the rest of us deserve our support for the value they provide the wider local community.

Jeremy Stoppelman, Yelp CEO

Published in Sunday's San Francisco Chronicle (1/18/2009)

January 13, 2009

From Apple, with Love

We always get a little giddy when Apple highlights Yelp's iPhone App. Now showing at www.apple.com/iphone

Happy

January 12, 2009

In defense of common sense...

The Chronicle’s most recent report about litigious business owners is eye opening for all of the wrong reasons.  The report reveals that Dr. Wong, a dentist who was the subject of a negative review on Yelp, never bothered to talk to the reviewer about his experience. Instead, she went straight to her lawyer.  Stranger still, she admits that she used the very mercury-based fillings that her patient complained about in his Yelp review.  We’re confused as to whether Dr. Wong actually denies the reviewer’s claims. 

One thing we are sure of is that litigation isn’t a very good substitute for customer service.

FOX KTVU's Amber Lee

Every now and then one of the local TV News outlets here in the Bay Area will do a story on Yelp and such reporting has often been sensational and inaccurate. Friday night provides a typical example, FOX's KTVU did a short piece mostly focused on Rooz Cafe which was actually news in 2007.

Typically when something like this is put together the producer or reporter makes an actual effort to contact you for comment and background. In this case the reporter sent us a note at 7:48 PM on a Friday night for a story that was set to run that same evening. Clearly she had no intention of having us participate (her note mentions a phone call, to which there is no voice message in our phone system). In lieu of an actual quote for the story, Amber repurposed (without attribution) a quote that I provided to the NYTimes (though when watching the clip you may get the impression it was part of a statement to KTVU).

I fully understand that this is neither the first time, nor the last time Yelp will be the subject of questionable journalism. However I'm providing these details, to reiterate for everyone that you can't believe everything you see (true for reviews, but also true for traditional media too).

Below is her note:

Lee, Amber (CTV-Oakland)
press@yelp.com
date: Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:48 PM
subject: interview/statement request for news story

I am a reporter for KTVU, Channel 2, the Fox affiliate in the San Francisco Bay Area.  I am working on a story about a business owner's complaint that his concerns about what he calls "false negative reviews of his cafe" and what he calls Yelp's lack of response.  I also spoke with folks who support Yelp.  We would like to speak with Yelp for this story .  We tried calling you earlier, but received no response. I can be reached on my cell phone at XXX-XXX-XXXX or in the newsroom at XXX-XXX-XXXX.  If you have trouble reaching me, ask for Mark Richardson, our assignment editor.

Thanks,
Amber 

And the story at 10:

Ktvu

The Yelp Web Log

The official voice of Yelp HQ in San Francisco. It's a place for us to talk about press, product and policy at Yelp.com.

Looking for the Community Blog?

See what's going on in other Yelp Communities!